A $5 million jury verdict that found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E. Jean Carroll was “grossly excessive” and he should either get a new trial or have to pay less in damages, the former president’s lawyers contended on Thursday.
In court documents filed in federal court in Manhattan, Trump’s attorneys argued the $2 million that the jury awarded Carroll for the battery claim, involving an alleged attack in a New York City department store in the 1990s, is inflated because the jurors did not find by a “preponderance of the evidence” that Trump had raped Carroll — only that he’d sexually abused her.
“Such abuse could have included groping of Plaintiff’s breasts through clothing or similar conduct, which is a far cry from rape,” the filing said.
The jury had also awarded Carroll just under $3 million on her defamation claim. Trump’s lawyers contended in the filing that amount should be reduced as well since part of the award stemmed from Trump denying he raped her.
Trump’s legal team asked the judge to either reduce the total $5 million award to about $900,000 or grant Trump a new trial.
Carroll’s attorney, Roberta Kaplan, called Trump’s arguments “frivolous.”
The jury “carefully considered the evidence that Ms. Carroll presented” during the two-week trial that ended last month, Kaplan said, and “Trump did not put on a single witness of his own.”
Kaplan added: “This time, Trump will not be able to escape the consequences of his actions.”
Trump lawyer Joe Tacopina did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Carroll’s suit included a battery claim for the alleged attack in the dressing room of a Bergdorf Goodman department store near Trump Tower in 1996.
The battery claim included different elements, including one for rape and one for sexual abuse.
Asked on its verdict sheet whether Carroll, 79, had proven “by a preponderance of the evidence” that “Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll,” the nine-person jury checked the box that said “no.” Asked whether Carroll had proven that “Mr. Trump sexually abused Ms. Carroll,” the jury checked the box that said “yes.”
Jurors did not speak to reporters after the verdict to explain their rationale. Carroll testified that Trump raped her, but said she was attacked from behind and did not see how he penetrated her.
Trump, who has consistently denied Carroll’s claims and any wrongdoing, has also filed a notice of appeal in the case.
The case that went to trial was Carroll’s second lawsuit against Trump. In a court filing earlier this week, Trump also attempted to use the jury’s verdict to block a separate, still–pending defamation suit that Carroll filed against Trump when he was president, where she argued he’d defamed her by calling her rape claim a hoax.
The filing contends that suit — which had been tied up in appeals on whether Trump had presidential immunity against her claims — should not be allowed to proceed since the jury in the other case did not find him liable for rape.
The “operative question in this case is, and has always been, whether a rape occurred in the Bergdorf Goodman dressing room,” Trump’s filing said, and the jury “found that one did not.”
Kaplan pushed back on that argument as well earlier this week.
“Contrary to Donald Trump’s latest arguments, the jury’s verdict makes complete sense — because the jury believed E. Jean Carroll when she testified that Trump had sexually abused her, it concluded that Trump knowingly lied about Ms. Carroll when he later claimed otherwise,” she said.
